基于水体指数的镜泊湖叶绿素a质量浓度反演研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

黑龙江省教育厅项目(1353MSYQN025);牡丹江师范学院服务地方专项(FD201602,FD2017001)


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    结合2015年9月镜泊湖30个有效采样点的实测叶绿素a质量浓度和同步Landsat 8 OLI数据,通过分析叶绿素a的光谱特征,在Landsat 8 OLI数据11个波段中,选择前7个波段(B1、B2、B3、B4、B5、B6、B7)单独或组合建立叶绿素a质量浓度反演模型。利用多元统计分析法分析发现,波段组合B5/B3、(B3+B4)/B5、B3/(B1+B5) 模型精度较好,决定系数R2分别为0.754 1、0.774 3、0.739 6。作为对比,另外选取典型的水体指数建立叶绿素a质量浓度反演模型;其中归一化水体指数(NDWI)、改进归一化水体指数(MNDWI)、增强型水体指数(EWI)模型较好,R2均大于0.7,分别为0.747 6、0.726 7、0.763 5。选取上述6种模型,利用剩余采样点进行精度检验,结果预测值与实测值之间的R2为0.071 1~0.809 4,其中,NDWI模型反演R2值为0.761 4,平均相对误差为13.0%,最大相对误差为22.4%,最小相对误差为1.4%;均方根误差为0.20 μg/L。与波段组合模型相比,水体指数模型虽然精度没有较大的提高,但其模型摆脱了波段的随机组合,更适合用来作为镜泊湖叶绿素a常用的监测方法。通过NDWI模型对镜泊湖叶绿素a质量浓度的反演,发现镜泊湖叶绿素a质量浓度分布具有一定的空间差异性,大体趋势为靠近岸边的浅水区叶绿素a质量浓度高于湖心的深水区,有河流注入的来水区高于其他湖区。

    Abstract:

    Combined the chlorophyll a concentrations of 30 sampling sites in Jinpo Lake collected in September of 2015 with the Landsat 8 OLI data, the spectral characteristics of chlorophyll a were analyzed. In 11 bands of Landsat 8 OLI data, the first seven bands(B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7) were selected to construct the chlorophyll a concentration inversion model individually or in combination using multivariate statistical analysis method. The results showed that B5/B3, (B3+B4)/B5, and B3/(B1+B5) model showed better accuracy with R2 0.754 1, 0.774 3 and 0.739 6 respectively. As a comparison, several typical water body index models were selected, in which the NDWI, MNDWI and EWI models had their R2 larger than 0.7, (0.747 6, 0.726 7 and 0.763 5 respectively). Then we chose the six models for further regression analysis. The results of the 6 models showed that the R2 between predicted values and measured chlorophyll a were in the range 0.071 1-0.809 4. In the NDWI model, R2 was 0.761 4 with average relative error of 13%, the maximum relative error of 22.4%, the minimum relative error of 1.4%, and the root mean square error of 0.20 μg/L. Compared with the band combination model, the water body index model did not need the band random combination and was more suitable as a common method for monitoring water quality in lakes. The spatial distribution of chlorophyll a concentrations showed some space variability. The chlorophyll a concentrations in shallow water areas were higher than those in the central area, whereas the chlorophyll a concentrations in the inlet area were higher than those in other areas.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘宇,李旭龙.基于水体指数的镜泊湖叶绿素a质量浓度反演研究[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2019,45(2):.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-04-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码