新烟碱类化合物几何构型优化方法的选择
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Selection of method for geometry optimization on neonicotinoid compounds
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    选用具有晶体结构实测数据的2种新烟碱类化合物吡虫啉和吡虫啉的N3位甲基取代物分子构型为基点,采用多种方法/基组对其结构进行优化。通过比较AM1、RHF/631G、RHF/631G(d)和B3LYP/631G、B3LYP/631G(d)等方法/基组优化得到的优势构型参数与试验所测定的晶体结构数据,并结合单点能、红外光谱特征峰值和优化所耗CPU时间等多个因素进行分析,结果表明:AM1、RHF/631G和B3LYP/631G 3种方法/基组优化2种目标化合物的所需CPU时间较短,但优化效果较差;RHF/631G(d)和B3LYP/631G(d) 方法/基组所得结果均与晶体构型十分吻合,其中B3LYP/631G(d)方法所得结果最接近试验值,且2种化合物优化所需CPU时间比RHF/631G(d)法分别少31.1%和25.1%;3种方法相比较,B3LYP/631G(d)方法为新烟碱类化合物量子化学和定量构效关系研究最合适的方法。

    Abstract:

    Geometry optimization was carried out on neonicotinoid based on the crystal structure and molecular configuration of imidacloprid and the methyl substituent at N3 position of imidacloprid using a variety of methods and basis sets. Comparing the structural parameters obtained from calculation with the crystal structure data via AM1,RHF/631G, RHF/631G(d)and B3LYP/631G, B3LYP/631G(d) combined with the singlepoint energy, infrared spectroscopy and optimized CPU time, the result showed: the optimized CPU time of AM1, RHF/631G and B3LYP/631G were shorter, but the optimization was less effective; The optimization results of RHF/631G (d) and B3LYP/631G (d) were very consistent with the crystal conformation, among which the one obtained by B3LYP/631G was more accurate and consumed less CPU time than that obtained by RHF/631G (d). Therefore, B3LYP/631G (d) was the most appropriate method for studying quantum chemical and QSAR of the neonicotinoid compound.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王辉宪.新烟碱类化合物几何构型优化方法的选择[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,37(6):693-670.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2011-07-19
  • 最后修改日期:2011-11-08
  • 录用日期:2011-12-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2011-12-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码